I have read many articles (both pro and con) on the issue of raising the minimum wage, and here is my own conclusion. Feel free to disagree.
There are many reasons why a minimum wage that is too low can actually be bad for the U.S:
1. It forces the government (and taxpayers) to subsidize low-value labor: Any minimum wage that results in the wage earner being eligible for food stamps and other government assistance means one thing and one thing only: This person's labor is being subsidized by the government--by taxpayers. We all know that when you subsidize something, you get more of it. Therefore, a low minimum wage encourages companies to behave as if they are dealing in a third-world country. As a result, they will exploit the cheap labor. They will hire more low-wage employees. GDP per capita will go down. That's bad for all of us.
2. It discourages competitive technological advancements: When given the option of hiring low wage workers, employers will not work to leverage and maximize their laborers' value via training or education. They will not utilize modern, computerized, robotic technology and so will ultimately lose out to more advanced countries in the long term. Overall GDP per capita will go lower and lower until the U.S. resembles a third world country. Everybody will lose, since our "old and flabby" industry will look more and more like the obsolete technology associated with former communist regimes, while more and more U.S. factories close down because they cannot compete globally. And once we reach that tipping point, it's almost impossible to reverse the downward spiral.
3. Attempting to compete globally on the basis of low wages is a losing game: We cannot possibly compete globally on the basis of "low" wages because there are plenty of developing countries that will always beat us soundly at that game. Instead, we must compete via technology and know-how, which requires that we treat our employees like valuable assets with many potential skills to be developed, rather than like minimally-trained monkeys.
4. It encourages illegal immigration of poorly-qualified workers: Whether or not it is truly a bad thing, many people worry about the millions of illegal immigrants flowing into the U.S. People immigrate illegally to the U.S. because they believe they can get a job requiring minimal skills. They believe it because it is true. They can work in a packing plant, or make beds in hotels, or pick fruit, or flip burgers. (Many such jobs would otherwise quickly go extinct.) So let's say you own a large orchard. You can either invest in a big, expensive fruit picking machine that requires 5 educated, knowledgeable American operators, or you can hire 500 seasonal illegal alien fruit pickers. For those who want to curb illegal immigration, it only makes sense that a higher minimum wage would encourage the orchard operator to purchase the machine and employ legal American citizens. Bottom line: a lower minimum wage attracts illegal immigration. And if, on the other hand, you're actually wanting to attract immigrants, why not instead attract immigrants who have valuable job skills, who know they will be paid accordingly, and who will truly benefit this country? Or at the very least, immigrants who are willing and able to work hard, learn English, get an education and learn a skill? Once again, you get what you encourage.
5. It perpetuates an unfortunate and dangerous myth: A low minimum wage gives American children the false impression that they can leave high school and get a job without learning how to read and write. Unfortunately, that job turns out to be a low-paying job that traps them for the rest of their lives.
Tragically, it has been reported that less than half (44%) of 25-to-34 year old high school graduates operate at literacy levels of 3 or higher. That means that more than 4 out of 10 working age adults don’t have the functional literacy skills to perform even the most basic jobs. Yet we allow these people to graduate based on the erroneous belief that they will find "some sort of job." What do we get instead? People who either aren't willing or aren't capable of working at, say, a packing plant for minimum wage. In other words, unwed mothers, drug dealers, welfare recipients and prison inmates.
The sooner we explode this diabolical myth, the better. It will force us to not allow children to leave the educational system until they are truly employable. Our education system--which should include practical training programs--would still be far less expensive than the cost of welfare, crime and incarceration. Having a decent minimum wage drives this ugly-but-true reality home to everybody--parents, educators, politicians and the students and job searchers themselves.
6. It's demoralizing and short-changes human potential: Psychological studies show that people conform to their own and others' expectations. Implementing a low minimum wage and forcing people to go on welfare, food stamps or "disability" is demoralizing to them, beats them down, and quells the human spirit. Worst of all, it causes them to be addicted to government assistance, which costs us all. Why promote a tragic system like this? Why not have a society in which every human being is treated with a certain minimum dignity and is expected and encouraged to learn and grow? It costs the same either way. The human landscape is littered with human failures who became failures because they were led to this expectation and embraced it.
Pretending that people ought to be able to support themselves on a low minimum wage without government assistance is a deception that's not only unfair to unskilled laborers, it's unfair to everyone else as well. Our economic system must be based on honesty, not deception; otherwise it soon crumbles...and it must be based on encouragement rather than demoralization.
Is this a touch-feely reason that has more to do with psychology than economics? Yes!...and for this very reason it just may be the most important argument of all.
7. It doesn't solve the problem of unemployment: The true unemployment rate in the U.S. is much higher than the official rate of 6.7%; it is estimated to be upwards of 37.2% However, lack of jobs is not the primary reason behind high unemployment in the U.S. It is lack of job skills. You can lower the minimum wage down to 10 cents and it's not going to result in those good jobs being filled.
So what about the "crappy" jobs...i.e., those unfilled minimum wage jobs? If we have such a high unemployment rate, why aren't those jobs all filled immediately? It's easy to say the reason is because they pay less than people get on welfare or dealing drugs or whatever. That is often true...but would YOU be willing to work at one of those dead-end jobs for the rest of your life? Are you sure? One thing we can say for sure: It's NOT because the wages are too high.
Would a lower minimum wage create more job openings? Possibly...but not jobs that people would want. Not jobs that would support them. Not jobs that would actually raise GDP per capita. Instead, it would create domestic service jobs (most likely filled by illegals) that would add virtually nothing to overall GDP growth, but would instead benefit wealthier people whose employees would be effectively subsidized by the government. For instance, people might hire a few more servants (read: virtual slaves) who would tend to the geraniums in their back yard, scrub their floors, cook their meals etc. At least half of this "catering to the privileged" would be funded by our own taxpayer dollars via food stamps, etc. I don't know about you, but this is not the kind of society or country I would want to live in. It's state-supported feudalism that further enriches the few at the expense of the many.
8. Reasons typically used to argue against the minimum wage...are myths: Here are three common reasons given as arguments against a higher minimum wage:
a) The minimum wage kills jobs
b) Increasing the minimum wage hurts small business
c) Increasing the minimum wage only helps teenagers
These all sound like logical, believable reasons for opposing a minimum wage hike. Trouble is, they aren't true.
9. Increasing the minimum wage would help to mitigate wealth inequality: Wealth inequality is growing at an alarming rate. Half the world's wealth is now owned by 85 people (out of 7 billion total.) A country like Mexico--which has the worlds wealthiest individual, Carlos Slim--illustrates rather nicely this grotesque wealth inequality. Some people would call this a modern form of feudalism & serfdom. At least with the feudalism of the early middle ages, the lord had some motivation to look after the welfare of his serfs.
10. Increasing the minimum wage helps fight deflation: Increasing the minimum wage tends to result in all wages rising, not just the minimum wage. This would fight deflation much more effectively than QE, and would would help the U.S. inflate its way out of debt.
11. A low minimum wage does not make a country wealthy: Some people question why we ought to have a minimum wage. Some countries still do not have a minimum wage. I would not want to live in most of these countries. Germany is an exception, but I know from personal acquaintance that while they've increased their level of employment, their lowest wages are very low, and do not really qualify as "jobs" in that respect. Also, their government assistance programs are extremely liberal. The U.S. minimum wage is actually relatively low compared to other developed countries that do have a minimum wage.
12. The benefits of a decent minimum wage is supported by history: The chart below shows two things:
a) a couple of hikes in the minimum wage in the 1950's--effectively doubling the wage rate!--spurred a long positive growth trend in GDP growth per capita. (Imagine what people would say if someone proposed doubling the minimum wage rate today!)
b) The current minimum wage is not high by historical standards, especially in relation to GDP per capita.
No longer do we have children working 14 hr days in dirty, dangerous environments. No longer are coal mining accidents commonplace. Instead, workers are accorded a degree of dignity and respect...all because of laws that were passed as a result of the revulsion the American people felt when they observed the way some workers were being mistreated. Did huge hikes in the minimum wage cause rampant unemployment and bring the U.S. to its knees? History says that, on the contrary, it benefited everybody.
“Today, you and I are pledged to take further steps to reduce the lag in the purchasing power of industrial workers and to strengthen and stabilize the markets for the farmers’ products. The two go hand in hand. Each depends for its effectiveness upon the other. Both working simultaneously will open new outlets for productive capital. Our Nation so richly endowed with natural resources and with a capable and industrious population should be able to devise ways and means of insuring to all our able-bodied working men and women a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work. A self-supporting and self-respecting democracy can plead no justification for the existence of child labor, no economic reason for chiseling workers’ wages or stretching workers’ hours. Enlightened business is learning that competition ought not to cause bad social consequences which inevitably react upon the profits of business itself. All but the hopeless reactionary will agree that to conserve our primary resources of man power, government must have some control over maximum hours, minimum wages, the evil of child labor and the exploitation of unorganized labor.”